When a redesign is justified
A redesign deserves consideration when the site is difficult to use on a phone, slow, inaccessible, hard to update or unclear about the next step. Visual age alone is not enough. Review user journeys, enquiries, search traffic, content quality and maintenance limits to determine whether focused repairs or a wider rebuild make more sense.
The largest risk: losing URLs and search signals
A new site that changes addresses without a migration plan can turn useful pages into errors and break external links. Keep valuable URLs where practical. For every changed address, map the most relevant final page and use a direct permanent redirect. Preserve useful copy, titles, internal links and media rather than starting from an empty template.
What to retain and what to change
Retain accurate content, proven user journeys, important URLs, analytics history and functions that people rely on. Improve the layout, hierarchy, mobile experience, accessibility, performance and code where evidence supports the change. The objective is a clearer and more maintainable site without throwing away assets that already work.
A controlled redesign process
The process covers an inventory of current routes and content, analytics and SEO review, design, development, redirect mapping, testing and monitoring after release. The monitoring period and correction scope are agreed in the proposal according to the risks of the specific website.