// Tech

Three.js Editor — When to Use It, When to Skip

The official Three.js Editor is a free WebGL scene editor in the browser — useful for quick scene building, limited for production work.

The Three.js Editor (threejs.org/editor) is a free WebGL scene editor that runs entirely in the browser. Drag-drop glTF files, set lights, position cameras, export to JSON. Useful for: prototyping a scene quickly, learning Three.js by clicking around, building a static asset that gets exported and used as JSON in production. Less useful for: anything with custom shaders, animation timelines, or scroll-driven logic. For production I model in Blender, scaffold the scene in code, never use the editor for final assets. The editor is a learning tool more than a production tool — Blender + Vite + Three.js is the production stack.

What this delivers

Concrete output: a working three js editor integration on a real production site, not a demo. The integration includes device-tier detection so weak phones get a lighter version automatically. Source files are handed over in their original formats — Blender, GLSL, glTF — so any future developer can continue where I stopped.

How I work with it

On a typical project, three js editor ships as a self-contained module: one entry-point JS file, one CSS file, asset bundle below 1.5MB total. I keep the integration sandboxed so the rest of the site stays SEO-friendly classical HTML. Frame budget targets 60 FPS on a mid-range Android, with a measurable fallback below.

Performance budget

Lighthouse mobile target: 85+ across all categories. I measure on real devices, not just emulator. Asset compression: glTF + Draco for meshes, KTX2 for textures, Brotli for shaders. Lazy-load any three js editor scene that isn't above the fold so the first paint stays under 1.5s.

When this is overkill

If the goal is a simple e-commerce listing or content blog, a full three js editor setup is overkill — a CSS-driven hero plus static images converts just as well at 1/10 the cost. three js editor earns its keep when the brand needs a memorable visual moment or when 3D actually clarifies the product (configurators, tours, demos).

Frequently asked questions

Why pick this technology over alternatives?
It has the largest production-quality ecosystem, the most documentation, and the most experienced developers available. For a site you want to maintain for 3+ years, ecosystem maturity matters more than feature peak.
What if a newer tool comes out next year?
I track new tooling and migrate when it makes sense, but only after the new tool ships stable production releases for at least 6-9 months. I don't rebuild client sites on bleeding-edge tools — that's the path to broken sites.
How long does this take?
Standard scope: 4-6 weeks from contract signature to live site. Larger scope (configurator, multi-scene scrollytelling) takes 8-12 weeks. Rush projects (2-3 weeks) are accepted with a 30-40% rush surcharge.
What does it cost?
Hero-section 3D upgrade: \$1,500-\$2,500. Full multi-scene 3D site: \$3,500-\$8,000. Configurator with custom shaders: \$5,000-\$12,000. All fixed-price, source code included. EUR equivalents on request.
What if my visitors are on weak phones?
The site detects device tier before the first scene loads and serves a lighter version on weak hardware (fewer particles, simpler shaders). Devices without WebGL get a static fallback that preserves the visual language and conversion path.

Ready to ship a 3D experience?

Tell me what you need — fixed price, fixed deadline, no surprises.

Pozovi